What is a key opinion a reviewer must develop related to the work under review?

A key opinion that a reviewer must develop related to the work under review is the completeness, accuracy, and reasonableness of that work. This is crucial because the reviewer’s role is to assess whether the appraisal meets the established standards and guidelines, including the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP).

Evaluating completeness requires the reviewer to determine if all necessary information and data have been adequately included and considered in the appraisal. Accuracy is about verifying that the calculations, methodologies, and conclusions drawn in the appraisal are correct and supported by appropriate evidence. Reasonableness relates to ensuring that the approaches taken, as well as the conclusions reached, logically align with the data and the context of the appraisal.

This comprehensive approach helps maintain the integrity of the appraisal process and ensures that users of the appraisal can rely on its findings for decision-making. It’s vital for the reviewer to form a well-rounded opinion on these aspects, as they directly influence the overall credibility and utility of the appraisal in question.