In the scenario of a jurisdictional exception, which action is NOT required by the appraiser?

In the context of a jurisdictional exception, the appraiser is aware that certain laws or regulations take precedence over the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). While the appraiser must follow applicable laws, there are specific obligations that arise from citing a jurisdictional exception.

One of these obligations is documenting the jurisdictional exception clearly. This helps ensure transparency in the appraisal process and provides a record justifying why certain USPAP standards were not fully followed. In addition, the appraiser must disclose which parts of USPAP have been affected by the jurisdictional exception. This practice informs stakeholders and clients of the limitations imposed by law and maintains the integrity of the appraisal process.

Furthermore, the appraiser is required to comply with the relevant laws governing the situation, as those laws dictate the appraiser's actions in specific circumstances.

However, explaining the implications of the jurisdictional exception to clients is not a required action within this context. The focus is primarily on compliance with the law and proper documentation rather than providing an explanatory narrative about the implications. Thus, while communication with clients is important in many aspects of appraisal work, it is not a formal requirement in relation to the jurisdictional exception itself.